|
Post by Bioshock Infinite WD on Jun 14, 2014 3:30:17 GMT
I feel like the only one excited for this game... Possibly because I've heard next to nothing about Borderlands, and when they announced didn't even know that it was based on a game. Due to that, I have no preconceptions of it, and instead simply have the fact that it looks pretty cool from the trailer and screenshots and I really like Westerns, so a western in space or whatever done by Telltale seems like an okay idea to me. But yes, I would have rather had TTG games for: Bioshock Breaking Bad True Detective Cowboy Bebop and Bastion(the least likely, but I want it sooooo bad) Also, L.A. Noir. Bioshock? Personally I can't even begin to figure out how that would work, the only conceivable way would to make a new city, and that would not plain and simple, you really need the people that made Bioshock, and they are no longer together, and they are all busy, and Telltale, well, they are great with characters, but could they really create a world as beautiful and mysterious as Rapture or Columbia? I don't think so, that, and the last time a Bioshock game was done without Irrational, well, we got Bioshock 2, and well, its Bioshock 2, Breaking Bad though, that I can totally see working, I just don't think AMC is going to just hand it over.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 14, 2014 14:28:27 GMT
I feel like the only one excited for this game... Possibly because I've heard next to nothing about Borderlands, and when they announced didn't even know that it was based on a game. Due to that, I have no preconceptions of it, and instead simply have the fact that it looks pretty cool from the trailer and screenshots and I really like Westerns, so a western in space or whatever done by Telltale seems like an okay idea to me. But yes, I would have rather had TTG games for: Bioshock Breaking Bad True Detective Cowboy Bebop and Bastion(the least likely, but I want it sooooo bad) Also, L.A. Noir. Bioshock? Personally I can't even begin to figure out how that would work, the only conceivable way would to make a new city, and that would not plain and simple, you really need the people that made Bioshock, and they are no longer together, and they are all busy, and Telltale, well, they are great with characters, but could they really create a world as beautiful and mysterious as Rapture or Columbia? I don't think so, that, and the last time a Bioshock game was done without Irrational, well, we got Bioshock 2, and well, its Bioshock 2, Breaking Bad though, that I can totally see working, I just don't think AMC is going to just hand it over. I'm just going to kind of copy paste my argument from the TTG forums, but before I do that, Bioshock 2 was awesome. Better than Infinite, which I believe is the worst. Counting Burial at Sea as a separate game though, that would be the best.
|
|
|
Post by Bioshock Infinite WD on Jun 16, 2014 0:44:33 GMT
Bioshock? Personally I can't even begin to figure out how that would work, the only conceivable way would to make a new city, and that would not plain and simple, you really need the people that made Bioshock, and they are no longer together, and they are all busy, and Telltale, well, they are great with characters, but could they really create a world as beautiful and mysterious as Rapture or Columbia? I don't think so, that, and the last time a Bioshock game was done without Irrational, well, we got Bioshock 2, and well, its Bioshock 2, Breaking Bad though, that I can totally see working, I just don't think AMC is going to just hand it over. I'm just going to kind of copy paste my argument from the TTG forums, but before I do that, Bioshock 2 was awesome. Better than Infinite, which I believe is the worst. Counting Burial at Sea as a separate game though, that would be the best. Rapture won't work, I'm sorry, they have done it, four times? One in each game, it was already a bit stale by Bioshock 2, Burial at Sea was so different since it was before the fall, it didn't feel like a rehash, so, no, going back is just not happening, and also, we can't use Jack, he kind of, dies in the happy ending? Yes I know you can do a in between but still, and regardless, 2K is not giving Bioshock to Telltale, no, its staying with 2K Marin.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 16, 2014 1:49:00 GMT
I'm just going to kind of copy paste my argument from the TTG forums, but before I do that, Bioshock 2 was awesome. Better than Infinite, which I believe is the worst. Counting Burial at Sea as a separate game though, that would be the best. Rapture won't work, I'm sorry, they have done it, four times? One in each game, it was already a bit stale by Bioshock 2, Burial at Sea was so different since it was before the fall, it didn't feel like a rehash, so, no, going back is just not happening, and also, we can't use Jack, he kind of, dies in the happy ending? Yes I know you can do a in between but still, and regardless, 2K is not giving Bioshock to Telltale, no, its staying with 2K Marin. You're no fun. ._.
|
|
|
Post by Bioshock Infinite WD on Jun 16, 2014 2:27:42 GMT
I'm might be, I just a realest, I just would like to see a dear franchise pass on, and not be whipped for the next decade, I love Bioshock, two might have been sub par, but it was not the worst thing ever, but without its creator among the living, I can't see it going on, it was tied up perfectly in Part 2, and I openly believe it should have just died a painless end, now it looks like its going to be around forever, and that saddens me.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 16, 2014 2:35:54 GMT
I'm might be, I just a realest, I just would like to see a dear franchise pass on, and not be whipped for the next decade, I love Bioshock, two might have been sub par, but it was not the worst thing ever, but without its creator among the living, I can't see it going on, it was tied up perfectly in Part 2, and I openly believe it should have just died a painless end, now it looks like its going to be around forever, and that saddens me. I think Bioshock 2 is better than Infinite. In fact, Infinite is my least favorite... The only element that I kind of liked fomr Infinite more so than any other game in the series were Booker and Elizabeth.
|
|
|
Post by Bioshock Infinite WD on Jun 16, 2014 2:39:16 GMT
Well my personal favorite was Infinite, but lets not getting into which is better and why, that never ends well, the way I see it, 2K Marin is going to make the next Bioshock, whenever that will be, then maybe someone gets another shot, maybe, Telltale doesn't really strike me as the person that would get it though, it is the second biggest franchise 2K has, behind GTA, and I don't see them handing it over to a company that is, roughly middle size, but stranger things have happened.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 16, 2014 19:24:42 GMT
I feel like Rapture still has stories to tell, and it's founding would be a great one.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 20, 2014 2:00:03 GMT
I don't think I've ever played a Bioshock Game...I've wanted to try but I haven't..
(please dont hate me bio)
|
|
|
Post by Bioshock Infinite WD on Jun 20, 2014 3:01:22 GMT
I don't, I didn't play Bioshock until 2013, I was very late to the party, I thought the original Bioshock was not interesting first time I heard of it, I only bought Infinite because my friend bought it, and Angry Joe said it was awesome, and the rest is really history. Skip two though, its a unnecessary sequel, if you are going to buy them in any order, play Bioshock, then Infinite.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 20, 2014 3:02:19 GMT
I don't, I didn't play Bioshock until 2013, I was very late to the party, I thought the original Bioshock was not interesting first time I heard of it, I only bought Infinite because my friend bought it, and Angry Joe said it was awesome, and the rest is really history. Skip two though, its a unnecessary sequel, if you are going to buy them in any order, play Bioshock, then Infinite. Do not listen to Bio, Bioshock Two is better than Infinite. Trust me.
|
|
|
Post by Bioshock Infinite WD on Jun 20, 2014 3:08:01 GMT
In my opinion Bioshock two was not fantastic, its not bad, its just average to okay, it doesn't add all that much, the story is weaker, the gameplay is a step up from Bioshock, that is one thing it did right, but it doesn't need to be played to understand everything, and as of Burial at Sea part 2, its not canon, and the multiplayer was nothing special, not the worst game I have ever played, but not the best, its a good game, but from the Bioshock standard it's below average.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 20, 2014 3:22:53 GMT
In my opinion Bioshock two was not fantastic, its not bad, its just average to okay, it doesn't add all that much, the story is weaker, the gameplay is a step up from Bioshock, that is one thing it did right, but it doesn't need to be played to understand everything, and as of Burial at Sea part 2, its not canon, and the multiplayer was nothing special, not the worst game I have ever played, but not the best, its a good game, but from the Bioshock standard it's below average. It is still canon, Ken Levine said it was still Canon. And don't even talk about the story when you think Infinite is the best. Just don't. Sofia Lamb is a much better villain than Comstock, and her relationship with Delta doesn't involve any huge fucking plot holes. The relationship between Delta and Eleanor is better than that of Booker and Elizabeth. Mainly because Elizabeth doesn't act like she should. Someone who's never had contact with people who most of her life? Naturally she'd be happy and dancing and talking to everyone! No. Infinite is awful with gameplay. It removed hacking, multiple ammo types, the more unique weapons, you can only carry two weapons, removed unique enemy types, removed research, I think crafting also wasn't included in Bioshock 2, they got rid of gene tonics, the plasmids aren't as good, not as many chances for strategy, removed Adam(you just use money), gun upgrades aren't as good. Those are basically all facts... What did they add, let's see... Gear. Skylines. Tears. Gear are gene tonics, but not as good, and most of them relate to skylines. Skylines are fun, but a gimmick. They're useless most of the time. Tears are cool, but do not make up for removing just about everything else. Also in my opinion, the aesthetic and feel of Bioshock 2 was better than that of Infinite, and even the first. Marginally for the first... The story of Infinite was full of holes, and that's mainly what I've got against it. Bioshock 2 was very well done. Sofia Lamb was an incredible villain. Not as good as Ryan or Fontaine, but better than Comstock. Eleanor is a believable character, Sinclair is great, and generally, I liked many of the characters from Bioshock 2 compared to those from Infinite. I will say that counting Burial at Sea, Elizabeth is a great character, but I also count Burial at Sea as being separate form Infinite. So... Yeah, Bioshock 2 is much better than Infinite. Incredibly better. Niccc, if you play the Bioshock series, do not skip Bioshock Two, it's amazing.
|
|
|
Post by InfernoKun on Jun 20, 2014 7:57:36 GMT
Bioshock 2 was really fun to me. I don't remember if it had a long story or that it got repetitive, but I never finished it ._.
|
|
|
Post by OzzyUK on Jun 20, 2014 8:33:19 GMT
I like all the Bioshock games but the thing i didn't like about Infinite was the fact that you where forced to use all the Vigors, i preferred the way you could choose which ones you wanted in Bioshock 1&2 by buying them from the vending machines.
|
|