Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 30, 2018 8:47:03 GMT
I mean I don't think Kenny was overly aggressive or irrational at all. We all have a little pent up aggression towards those that aren't like us to start so imagine if he were part of a group that tried to steal your shit and murder you even if you did nothing wrong? I would treat Arvo like absolute DOG SHIT as well. As for the Jane thing? It's been discussed many times. If you thought Jane just gave up and let a baby get eaten to save her own skin, I'd try to kill her too. It was an asininely one-sided choice. The only ones that put down Kenny were the ones that were waiting for any little excuse to. That's another key issue. It's a really issue choice one way or the other. Either you stuck with Kenny all this time and this crazy lady just killed a baby fuck her. Or you never liked Kenny and have been waiting for this. Unless you wanted them both dead really really bad. I hated them both equally, so this choice was crazy difficult for me.
|
|
|
Post by wakemeup on Mar 30, 2018 10:14:31 GMT
That's another key issue. It's a really issue choice one way or the other. Either you stuck with Kenny all this time and this crazy lady just killed a baby fuck her. Or you never liked Kenny and have been waiting for this. Unless you wanted them both dead really really bad. I hated them both equally, so this choice was crazy difficult for me. Same, but I managed to kill them both
|
|
|
Post by Master Psychic on Mar 30, 2018 10:31:03 GMT
Honestly, they should just sticked to Kenny Vs Luke.
Yeah, would of been predictable, but alteast it would make more sense and Luke would have more of a purpose than Jane, who was introduced in the middle of episode 3.
What was even the point of having Clem form a bond with Luke if he was gonna die in such a lame way that was completely avoidable if they simply walked around the lake. My guess that the answer is so that we would have a reason to cry our eyes out, because shock value deaths is what the S2 writers believe Walking Dead truly is about.
I think Kenny Vs Luke was supposed to be the true resolution, but the writers thought that it wouldn’t be interesting because everyone guessed it since day one and then made Jane to make it unpredictable.
|
|
|
Post by Bioshock Infinite WD on Mar 30, 2018 16:24:45 GMT
Honestly, they should just sticked to Kenny Vs Luke. Yeah, would of been predictable, but alteast it would make more sense and Luke would have more of a purpose than Jane, who was introduced in the middle of episode 3. What was even the point of having Clem form a bond with Luke if he was gonna die in such a lame way that was completely avoidable if they simply walked around the lake. My guess that the answer is so that we would have a reason to cry our eyes out, because shock value deaths is what the S2 writers believe Walking Dead truly is about. I think Kenny Vs Luke was supposed to be the true resolution, but the writers thought that it wouldn’t be interesting because everyone guessed it since day one and then made Jane to make it unpredictable. I'm sensing that was a thing they did often. If it was too predictable they changed it, logic be damned. Christ, imagine if they had done that to the Stranger in TWDS1.
|
|